In Part 1 of our ACA series, we wrote about the importance of NOT procrastinating about – or waiting to see what happens to – ACA’s Pay or Play mandate.
Since then, you may have heard about former White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs’ prediction: “I don’t think the employer mandate will go into effect. It’s a small part of the law. I think it will be one of the first things to go.”
It’s certainly true that the ACA’s rollout since its’ 2010 passage has been marked by numerous clarifications, modifications and delays…and everyone’s heard about the technical difficulties experienced by those individuals trying to sign up on the federal “Exchange.” In fact, the Pay or Play rules — originally intended to start as of January 1, 2014 — has already been delayed twice and will not be fully implemented until 2016.
But it’s equally true that Pay or Play is not AT ALL “…a small part of the law.” Frankly, Mr. Gibbs should know better given his former position.
In fact, Pay or Play is a linchpin of the ACA on two critical levels:
The financial and policy implications of a Pay or Play repeal — not the least of which would be how to offset billions in lost revenue — are being debated on numerous fronts right now. Given the two-party dysfunction in Congress, the outcome will not be decided in the foreseeable future. Given the financial implications, it is very likely Pay or Play will survive pretty much intact.
So what’s next for large employers?
The ACA in general has significant implications for employers of all sizes, and Play or Play in particular has significant implications for large employers. Please visit us each week for further updates, ideas and recommendations.