Some HMOs and health insurance companies have recently been encouraging employers in the 51-100 employee range to renew their coverage early (i.e., in late 2015). That would allow these employers to forestall their ACA-required re-classification as a “small group” by up to 11 months, delaying their move to small group, community rated products — which are generally not as customizable as, and more expensive than, plans available to 100+ life groups.
Before opportunistic employers go changing their coverage’s plan year, there are a few legal concerns to consider.
Related Blog: How Do Non-Calendar Health Plan Years Affect Obamacare Reporting
Generally, employers are prohibited from changing their plan years in order to avoid unwelcome ACA outcomes – such as being forced out of a large group, experience rated plan into a small group community rated product.
In addition, the IRS’s final regulations on the ACA’s “employer shared responsibility” (pay or play) mandate state that once a plan year has been established, it can only be changed for a valid business purpose.
Specifically:
Under current IRS guidance, a valid business reason for changing plan years could include switching insurance carriers, corporate mergers, or a business acquisition. At the same time, they also have repeatedly indicated that a plan year change made solely for the purpose of avoiding/delaying an ACA-mandated requirement would not be well-received.
Related Blog: What to Look for in an ACA Software Solution
What’s the bottom line? Employers in the 51-100 range have an opportunity to delay a potentially costly transition into the community rated market, but ought to weigh the implications of such a change against the potential ACA penalties – and potential IRS intervention – that could/would result.
For continuous ACA Updates, sign up for our Healthcare and HR Blog below.